The first measured 24 hour production from Bakken wells is a very good predictor of the future production of that well. And it has also been confirmed that new wells with higher well numbers are producing a lot less. By searching these two lists, then eliminating the duplicates that appear on both lists, we find that perhaps 70 to 80 percent of all wells report their first 24 hours of measured production. An example below, and notice the second well listed does not give any production numbers: I have collected, from this source, the data from 2, wells dating from November 1st to the present date. Enno Peters gathered data from several thousand Bakken wells dating from the early Bakken t mid There were a more matches than this but had no data or incomplete data. But it was mostly because only a little over half my data overlapped his. I converted his monthly data to barrels per data by dividing the monthly data by There were sometimes great anomalies in the data so to smooth things out, on the first three charts below, I used a 50 well average.
God the Father has transplanted us from darkness into the Kingdom of His dear Son. Very few people understand that when they were saved, they were literally made a citizen of a heavenly kingdom, which will tie us then to when Christ returns and sets up His kingdom on earth. So our citizenship is in Heaven. The abode of God.
Get up-to-the-minute environmentally-friendly (or egregiously unfriendly) car news, reviews, high-quality photos and commentary about living green.
Primary source references As a preface to this document, I want to point out that it is a shame that we have to continue to refute the same arguments that evolutionists keep bringing up over and over again in their attempts to argue against the fact of creation, which fact has been well established since the day the earth was created ex nihilo several thousand years ago. It is also a shame that the masses have bought all this based on some circular reasoning about fossils, where fossils tend to be found buried, similarities between various life forms, the presence of certain decay products in rocks, and other inherently speculative arguments about the past, based on phenomena that exist in the present.
If I hope to accomplish anything, it will be to simply encourage critical thinking. One must get past the arguments ad populum that its popularity counts for something , ad hominem that if you attack the person making the argument, this counts for something , and especially ad baculum that there are people who have the clout to decree it as true , to ask the key questions and challenge the unsubstantiated assumptions and thinking of those who would hold to the evolution position.
Today there are an increasing number of anti-creationist authors who are producing books and periodicals that make this relatively brief presentation insufficient to deal with all the points in dispute. Those defending creation today who don’t have the time to devote their life’s study to gaining expertise in all fields of inquiry must principally be prepared to think critically, logically, and challenge unsubstantiated assumptions made by these people.
They must also keep a level head in the face of some vicious attacks and diatribes that will be directed against them, as is advised in the scriptures 1 Peter 3: By way of definitions, I want to point out that when I speak of “evolution,” I am referring to the popular contemporary use of the word, which in a nutshell is the belief that all life forms are related by ancestry, and that the first life form occurred spontaneously, all due to completely natural processes.
When I speak of “creation,” I am referring to the inherently obvious fact that the origin of all life forms can be attributed to a creator who purposefully created them with planning and intent, and the documented fact that this occurred over the course of a week’s time several thousand years ago. This document is not a scientific thesis, but an apologetic intended to be submitted and defended by me in an interactive, online electronic forum.
I claim no copyright on this document, and grant its use to the public domain. I have not written it with a view towards receiving any sort of financial or other personal gain, and I request that others utilizing this document do likewise. Those copying and disseminating this document shall assume full responsibility for defending it.
I do not agree to defend this document in any forum that I did not submit it, due to the practical limitations of my own time.
Middle Stone Age Tools
Yet the months since then show no global warming at all. Marc Morano – Climate Depot November 4, 2: Yet the months since then show no global warming at all Fig.
Learn about different types of radiometric dating, such as carbon dating. Understand how decay and half life work to enable radiometric dating. Play a game that tests your ability to match the percentage of the dating element that remains to the age of the object.
This chapter is from the book Searching for Adam, available in our online store. Introduction When did Adam come into existence? Evolutionists say Homo sapiens came into existence , to , years ago depending on which evolutionist you consult, because they do not all agree on what a Homo sapiens is. Today, many Christians, including many leaders and scholars, think they can.
From my reading and interaction with old-earth creationists of all varieties in 25 countries over the last 35 years, I think one reason many of them think they can harmonize the two is that they have not paid very careful attention to the relevant biblical texts. They have just assumed that the scientists have proven the age of the creation to be billions of years and the age of mankind to be many tens or hundreds of thousands of years.
Therefore, it is claimed, the Bible does not deal with the issue of the age of mankind or even how man came into existence. Of course, Green was not the first to reject the biblical chronology prior to Abraham. Most of the Church had accepted the millions of years at the beginning of the 19th century. Christian leaders proposed the gap theory 4 or the day-age view 5 of Genesis 1 to accommodate all those years.
They insist that the age question is an unimportant and divisive side issue that we can leave to the scientists to determine. These influential evangelical scholars who followed Green, directly or indirectly, include B. Warfield who in turn many recent evangelical theologians and others cite in support of their old-earth views being consistent with Scripture , 12 Francis Schaeffer, 13 Wayne Grudem, 14 Millard Erickson, 15 Walter Kaiser, 16 Robert Newman, 17 C.
The Lost World of Giants
Each of these kinds was created with a vast amount of information. There was enough variety in the information in the original creatures so their descendants could adapt to a wide variety of environments. All sexually reproducing organisms contain their genetic information in paired form.
Nov 22, · Get the latest international news and world events from Asia, Europe, the Middle East, and more. See world news photos and videos at
Researchers hope that by guiding stem cells in the laboratory into specific cell types, they can be used to treat diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, heart disease, or other disorders. The primary clinical source is the aborted fetus and unused embryos currently housed in frozen storage at IVF facilities. A developed stem cell line comes from a single embryo, becoming a colony of cells that reproduces indefinitely.
The issue of who or what As the nation sits embroiled over the battle of where to draw the line on ESCR, the real issue that truly divides us is whether embryonic stems represent a who or a what. In other words, are we talking about people or property? Wade we have not been willing or able as a nation to address the issue.
As a result, those who oppose ESCR and those who support it will never reach an acceptable point of compromise. Still, in the midst of the flurry of all this biotechnology and all the problems it presents, there is some very good news that has been overlooked by almost everyone. Cloning proves scientifically that life begins at conception—a position to which the author and most Christians philosophically already adhere.
Additionally, the insights provided by cloning technology destroy the scientific and legal basis of distinguishing a preembryo from an embryo, the popular distinction made at 14 days after conception. This is significant because this distinction determines the handling and treatment of human life less than 14 days old, which is so basic to all ESCR. In short, our understanding of embryonic development as provided by cloning technology could force not only those who participate in ESCR specifically, but also those who participate in in-vitro fertilization IVF procedures generally, to recognize there is no real preembryo—embryo distinction and that all human life begins at conception.
Answers to Emails on the Bible and Homosexuality
Why does a bee only visit one type of flower at a time? It seems such a waste of energy. I read that a supermarket won an award for its two-year-matured puddings. So, what happens over two years to bring out the flavour? Where I live, I use five different bins and the collections are fortnightly. Unlike many people I observe, I squash things like aluminium cans and plastic milk bottles.
Between about , and , years ago, the pace of innovation in stone technology began to accelerate very slightly. By the beginning of this time, handaxes were made with exquisite craftsmanship, and eventually gave way to smaller, more diverse toolkits, with an emphasis on flake tools rather.
Updates to this animation are now available Spiralling global temperatures. Click for full size animated version. The animated spiral presents global temperature change in a visually appealing and straightforward way. The pace of change is immediately obvious, especially over the past few decades. The relationship between current global temperatures and the internationally discussed target limits are also clear without much complex interpretation needed.
Features you can see: Why start in ? Humans are largely responsible for past warming so we have control over what happens next. What do the colours mean? The colours represent time. Purple for early years, through blue, green to yellow for most recent years. Can be found on twitter too: May 9, at 8:
Technology and Science News
Larger settlements like Jericho arose along salt and flint trade routes. Northern Eurasia was resettled as the glaciers of the last glacial maximum retreated. World population was at a few million people, likely below 5 million. Researchers probing the ocean bottom have found story-high towers of stone deep in the ocean near a section of volcanic fault ridges that extend for 6, miles along the Atlantic Ocean floor.
There were indications of settlement after 9, B. This settlement grew to city status by 7, B.
Robert Gagnon’s Answers to Emails on the Bible and Homosexuality _____ Index. I get a lot of email correspondence.
Paul Berry After building the product for Huffington Post, and owning the product and engineering groups at AOL after we were acquired, it was clear to me there was a huge gap between what the current CMS offering gave the world and what the world needed. Five years later we are at scale, moving the needle and doing to WordPress what Airbnb did to Craigslist.
Social and Centralized WordPress, Drupal, and the custom CMS solutions of the world are all independent, non-connected instances that each need to be updated individually. There are over 87 million instances of WordPress alone in the world, and each security upgrade, feature update, and every other single thing has to be updated for each site individually. By contrast, RebelMouse is a social, centralized platform built to keep up with the speed of the tech giants.
Our updates are pushed out to all of our sites at once and sometimes even multiple times a day with content creation tools integrated directly into social APIs. We can get clients off of clunky CMSs and into the future in a matter of days. We iterate with the times and tell you what’s changing in the world, how we’ve reacted to it, and how it’s built into the updates you get from the platform.
Demonocracy My question would be, where the heck are all of these so-called service jobs? How did offshoring jobs create them? T C Ross Perot gave warnings and even had flip charts showing exactly what would happen. Of course, everyone laughed and thought he was crazy. Semiore Butts Have you noticed our rotting,pot hole infested roadways in the US?
By: Marc Morano – Climate Depot November 4, PM with comments Special To Climate Depot. The Pause lengthens again – just in time for Paris. No global warming at all for 18 years 9 months – a new record.
Evolution as fact and theory Critics of evolution assert that evolution is “just a theory,” which emphasizes that scientific theories are never absolute, or misleadingly presents it as a matter of opinion rather than of fact or evidence. Evolutionary theory refers to an explanation for the diversity of species and their ancestry which has met extremely high standards of scientific evidence. An example of evolution as theory is the modern synthesis of Darwinian natural selection and Mendelian inheritance.
As with any scientific theory, the modern synthesis is constantly debated, tested, and refined by scientists, but there is an overwhelming consensus in the scientific community that it remains the only robust model that accounts for the known facts concerning evolution. For example, in common usage theories such as ” the Earth revolves around the Sun ” and “objects fall due to gravity” may be referred to as “facts,” even though they are purely theoretical.
From a scientific standpoint, therefore, evolution may be called a “fact” for the same reason that gravity can: Under the colloquial definition, the theory of evolution can also be called a fact, referring to this theory’s well-established nature. Thus, evolution is widely considered both a theory and a fact by scientists. Strict proof is possible only in formal sciences such as logic and mathematics, not natural sciences where terms such as “validated” or “corroborated” are more appropriate.
Thus, to say that evolution is not proven is trivially true, but no more an indictment of evolution than calling it a “theory. Level of support for evolution An objection is often made in the teaching of evolution that evolution is controversial or contentious. This goal followed the Institute’s ” wedge strategy ,” an attempt to gradually undermine evolution and ultimately to “reverse the stifling dominance of the materialist worldview, and to replace it with a science consonant with Christian and theistic convictions.
The scientific consensus of biologists determines what is considered acceptable science, not popular opinion or fairness, and although evolution is controversial in the public arena, it is entirely uncontroversial among experts in the field.
Sunday, August 21, I teach a course on 1 Corinthians at the seminary, have used the commentaries you cite as textbooks, and have more familiarity with the literature generally than you do. Partaking in sexual immorality most certainly does have to do with paganism. It has to do, at least in part, with a return to the immoral lifestyles out of which they emerged, though Paul admits in the case of incest they are even outdoing the pagans in immorality. Paul repeatedly warns Gentile converts in all his letters not to live as they once lived as Gentiles who did not know God.
Get the latest science news and technology news, read tech reviews and more at ABC News.
Australopithecus africanus — The word “Australopithecus” means “southern ape. Raymond Dart, professor of anatomy at Witwatersrand University in Johannesburg, was the first to study these fossils. In at Taung in South Africa, Dart discovered a fossil skull consisting of a full face, teeth and jaws, and an endocranial cast of the brain. The brain size was cc. Its age is currently felt to be around two to three million years old. Dart was convinced that some teeth were man-like and thus concluded a transition between apes and man.
His opinions on the matter of this particular skull were largely scorned by the scientists of this time who considered it nothing more than a young chimpanzee now considered to be about three years of age. The skull was soon known derisively as “Dart’s baby. With Piltdown Man’s human cranium and apelike jaw, it was hard to reconcile it to the Taung Child. Although Dart gave up fossil hunting for some time, all was not lost.
Years after the discovery of the “Taungs child”, as it is known today, Dart and Broom found other Australopithecines at Kromdraii, Swartkrans and Makapansgat. These finds of similar creatures seemed to vindicate Dart and Broom, and the scientific community again accepted their finds as they do today.